Smalltalk Tidbits, Industry Rants http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView Cincom Product Manager jrobertson@cincom.com Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:21:16 EDT http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/images/cst_small.jpg Smalltalk Tidbits, Industry Rants http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView 50 81 en-us James A. Robertson Copyright 2007 Cincom Systems, Inc. 2009-07-03T11:21:16-04:00 39.214103 -76.878807 Smalltalk Daily 7/3/09: Code Visibility in Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Smalltalk_Daily_7/3/09:_Code_Visibility_in_Web_Velocity&entry=3424072876 smalltalkDaily Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:21:16 EDT

Today's Smalltalk Daily looks at one of the nice browsing features of Web Velocity - changing code visibility while continuing to edit your own code. To watch, click on the viewer below:

If you have trouble viewing that directly, you can click here to download the video directly

You can also watch it on YouTube:

Technorati Tags: , ,

]]> 3424072876 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3424072876 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3424072876 no James Robertson Web Velocity Code Visibility A look at changing the level of code visibility while editing your own source in Web Velocity 3:01 smalltalk, dynamic, seaside, web velocity nonadult James Robertson Web Velocity Code Visibility http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3424072876 Eating our own Dogfood http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Eating_our_own_Dogfood&entry=3424066040 smalltalk Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:27:20 EDT

As Michael mentions on this weekend's podcast (out on Sunday), the Web Velocity site needs some work on the presentation side - but at least we're now eating our own dogfood. The site is running Web Velocity now.

Technorati Tags: ,

]]> 3424066040 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3424066040 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3424066040 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3424066040 Plugging Away in Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Plugging_Away_in_Web_Velocity&entry=3424025198 webVelocity Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:06:38 EDT

I've been doing some website/web app building in Web Velocity and Seaside today; it is so much easier than working with the server page/servlet model. Instead of a page and a servlet, I had this for a small form:


html form: 
		[html table: 
			[html tableRow: [self renderUserRowOn: html].
			html tableRow: [self renderPasswordRowOn: html].
			isLoggedIn ifTrue: [html tableRow: [self renderFileRowOn: html]].
			html tableRow: [self renderButtonRowOn: html]]]

And the code for handling the form is all in the #renderButtonRowOn: method - not sitting in two places (form and servlet). Then there's the whole component based assembly thing. I built the Media Search app, but that mostly used Web Velocity scaffolding - I didn't get into much Seaside level work. Here's the rendering of the main part of the app I was mucking with:


renderContentOn: html

	html div
		id: #wrapper;
		with: [self renderDetailsOn: html]

renderDetailsOn: html
	
	html render: WVHeader new.
	html render: WVMain new.
	html render: WVFooter new

I know other people have written about this before, but doing this kind of component based assembly in code, as opposed to with html include statements, just makes life simpler. Need to change something? Use the refactoring tools to make changes. Instead of moving back and forth between toolsets, everything is in one place. It's all very cool.

Technorati Tags: ,

]]> 3424025198 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3424025198 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3424025198 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3424025198 Don't Leave Your iPhone in the Car http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Dont_Leave_Your_iPhone_in_the_Car&entry=3423990919 gadgets Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:35:19 EDT

Apple has responded to reports of the iPhone getting hot:

Apple, however, has issued what some might call a "common sense" warning: a support document that warns users not to keep the iPhone in an environment where temperatures can exceed 113 degrees Fahrenheit, including parked cars.

If it overheats, you might see this:

Hot iPhone

I've had the iPhone get pretty hot when I've had multiple radios going (WiFi, 3G, and Bluetooth) - although the battery ran down before I ever got close to a warning like that.

Technorati Tags: ,

]]> 3423990919 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423990919 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423990919 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423990919 Smalltalk Daily 7/2/09: Finding Things in Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Smalltalk_Daily_7/2/09:_Finding_Things_in_Web_Velocity&entry=3423980549 smalltalkDaily Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:42:29 EDT

Today's Smalltalk Daily looks at searching within Web Velocity - how do you find classes/methods, or senders/implementors within the browser environment?. To watch, click on the viewer below:

If you have trouble viewing that directly, you can click here to download the video directly

You can also watch it on YouTube:

Technorati Tags: , ,

]]> 3423980549 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423980549 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423980549 no James Robertson Finiding Things in Web Velocity How to find classes and methods in the Web Velocity environment 3:05 smalltalk, dynamic, seaside, web velocity nonadult James Robertson Finiding Things in Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423980549 Worst ad Ever http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 advertising Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:13:03 EDT

Microsoft really, really needs to deep six their ad agency - and sack the people who approved the latest ads. Don't believe me? Wander over here, and have a look at the latest ad. Afterwards, see if you can say that the ad created any pleasant thoughts about Microsoft or their products.

Even worse - they've apparently gone with a whole series of them. I imagine that one person likes these ads - Steve Jobs.

Technorati Tags: ,

]]> 3423921183 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423921183 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423921183 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 Louis Columbus 2009-07-01T17:45:07-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Tasteless, and to call it sophomoric is a compliment. If this is the best Microsoft can do, they are in trouble.</p> <p>My take: pull the ads now. </p> </div> ...and the Academy Award for Worst Judgment in a Browser Video Goes to MSFT blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 Tom K 2009-07-01T19:26:49-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Makes me long for the return of the Seinfeld ads...</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 Ken Boucher 2009-07-02T13:16:53-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I have a hard time judging the ads simply because I'm not on the same continent as the target audience of the ads.</p> <p>Years of public television have taught me that there is plenty of British humor that I simply don't begin to understand. Sure, I love Monty Python and Ab-Fab, but there's lot of other things I simply just don't get.</p> <p>Since these are ads targeted at the U.K., it doesn't surprise me that I don't find myself connecting in a positive way to them. There's no shortage of European ads that don't make sense in a North American marketplace.</p> </div> Different Audience, different reaction blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Worst_ad_Ever&entry=3423921183 George 2009-07-02T21:45:21-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I don't know what you're talking about, Jim.&nbsp; In fact, I have to say that was the best ad I've ever seen for Goatse.</p> </div> Huh? http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423921183 Phidgets from Smalltalk http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Phidgets_from_Smalltalk&entry=3423919474 smalltalk Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:44:34 EDT

The HPI guys have hooked up Phidgets (USB controllable gadgets) with Smalltalk. Looks pretty cool - there's a video at the link.

Technorati Tags:

]]> 3423919474 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423919474 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423919474 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423919474 Unto the Breach We Go http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Unto_the_Breach_We_Go&entry=3423908334 smalltalk Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:38:54 EDT

On the podcast that will come out on Sunday Michael and I will be talking about two things that have gotten a lot of discussion in the vwnc and vw-dev mailing lists of late:

  • The new implementation of Delays/Timers
  • The BraceConstructor (shich is a goodie)

If you have concerns about either one that you would like to hear addressed, send me an email or drop a comment - if you want your question to be verbal, then record a short MP3 of your question and email that.

Technorati Tags: , ,

]]> 3423908334 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423908334 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423908334 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Unto_the_Breach_We_Go&entry=3423908334 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Unto_the_Breach_We_Go&entry=3423908334 2009-07-01T17:43:46-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>sigh...it's *Unto* the breach.</p> <p>http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/269700.html</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Unto_the_Breach_We_Go&entry=3423908334 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Unto_the_Breach_We_Go&entry=3423908334 2009-07-02T01:44:59-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Thanks for changing it!...I know I'm in an uphill fight on this...</p> </div> http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423908334 Smalltalk at Boing Boing http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Smalltalk_at_Boing_Boing&entry=3423889754 smalltalk Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:29:14 EDT

They have the legendary Byte cover up :)

]]> 3423889754 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423889754 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423889754 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423889754 Smalltalk Daily 7/1/09: Introducing Web Velocity, Part 2 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Smalltalk_Daily_7/1/09:_Introducing_Web_Velocity,_Part_2&entry=3423889093 smalltalkDaily Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:18:13 EDT

Today's Smalltalk Daily continues from yesterday with Web Velocity, and demonstrates publishing your code to the embedded repository. To watch, click on the viewer below:

If you have trouble viewing that directly, you can click here to download the video directly

You can also watch it on YouTube:

Technorati Tags: , ,

]]> 3423889093 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423889093 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423889093 no James Robertson Publishing Code in Web Velocity How to publish your code to the embedded repository in Web Velocity 1:46 smalltalk, dynamic, seaside, web velocity nonadult James Robertson Publishing Code in Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423889093 Agile Web Development: Arden Thomas in Cologne http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Agile_Web_Development:_Arden_Thomas_in_Cologne&entry=3423838285 video Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:11:25 EDT

Here's Arden Thomas in Cologne, Germany on June 2nd, at our one day Smalltalk event. He spoke about Agile web development with Web Velocity, and gave a demo. To watch, click on the viewer below:

If you have trouble viewing that directly, you can click here to download the video directly

]]> 3423838285 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423838285 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423838285 no Arden Thomas Agile Web Development Arden Thomas talks about Web Velocity and Agile web development in Cologne, Germany on June 2, 2009 46:08 smalltalk, dynamic, web velocity, seaside, cologne nonadult Arden Thomas Agile Web Development http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423838285 Stupidity Squared http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 DRM Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:47:20 EDT

Here's Blizzard attempting to explain a really stupid decision - no LAN play in StarCraft 2:

Upcoming real-time strategy Windows game StarCraft II will ship without Local Area Network multiplayer support in an effort to combat piracy, says Blizzard, in an official statement sure to annoy if not outright confound series fans the world round. Calling it a "difficult decision," Blizzard's Bob Colayco reportedly told Joystiq that "moving away from LAN play and directing players to our upgraded Battle.net service was the best option to ensure a quality multiplayer experience with StarCraft II and safeguard against piracy."

So let's get the basics out of the way: Will this stop actual pirates who clone lots of copies of the game? No. Will it annoy the heck out of legal buyers of the game who just want to play with a few friends and their laptops? Yes

So who's the moron at Blizzard who couldn't figure that out on his own? That guy and everyone there who agrees with him should be sacked, on the grounds of being too stupid for the job...

Technorati Tags: ,

]]> 3423836840 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423836840 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 Henry 2009-07-01T05:55:44-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I'm not a fanboy, but online validation of some sort is the only measure that's been even remotely efficient at combatting piracy when it comes to games...</p> <p>Another option would be what Stardock recently did for Demigod, require a login to download patches.</p> <p>No, it won't stop cloning, but who on earth buys Starcraft to play single-player??? With no LAN, that's the only thing the cloners can do. (Otherwise you have GameRanger and its ilk)</p> <p>With the work that' needed for implementing LAN play, the quailty of service of Bnet, and the general connectivity nowadays compared to when their last RTS was released, it DOES make good sense.</p> <p>PS: If you regard requiring access to the internet in order to play a game multiplayer these days a major annoyance, you're stuck in the 90's ;)</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 anonymous 2009-07-01T08:03:31-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Comment by anonymous</p> <p> <p>Lots of us play games single player, and lots of us play games when there's no internet available to us (try taking a long flight or a long train ride sometime).</p> <p>The internet is nearly ubiquitous, but not quite. And the ability to play a LAN game without connecting to a central service makes sense regardless - those central services do sometimes go down.</p></p> </div> Re: Stupidity Squared blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 Henry 2009-07-01T09:12:15-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Singleplayer works without a net connection.</p> <p>So the only people with a "right" to be pissed off by this, are those gaming while travelling with friends by train or by plane.</p> <p>How often do you find youself on a LAN with the people you play with, with no internet connection and/or the game servers down novadays?? Have you tried using Battle.net for the last 10 years? I _can't_ remember a single time during those years I've wanted some Starcraft multiplayer, and found it to be inaccessible...</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 anonymous 2009-07-01T09:46:22-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Comment by anonymous</p> <p> <p>I don't deny that Blizzard has a perfect right to do this; I just deny that it makes any sense. It prevents no piracy, and will irritate some paying customers. How that makes sense for them is beyond me, but maybe you need an MBA for advanced stupidity...</p> </p> </div> Re: Stupidity Squared blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 2009-07-01T10:19:32-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>+ It forces all those wanting to play multiplayer to not pirate the game. (quite a few are perfectly willing to play online using services such as Hamachi or Gamespy if LAN is availiable).</p> <p>+ It prevents PC-bangs in Korea from buying just a few licenses to play online with, and setting up other (pirated versions) to be played in "internal" games. (This is possibly a big deal with Starcraft 2 in particular).</p> <p>+ It makes perfect economical sense in the amount of labour needed (or lack thereof) to implement.</p> <p>- It will irritate the rather miniscule amount of people who likes to play while travelling with friends, for the duration of their travel.</p> <p>To me, it makes perfect sense, and no, I don't have an MBA, neither in stupidity nor anything else.</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 anonymous 2009-07-01T10:43:39-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Comment by anonymous</p> <p> <p>It prevents none of the organized piracy you seem to think it will; cracked versions will appear in those places very quickly. The only people it gets in the way of are law abiding customers who will pay for the game. Great job, that.</p> </p> </div> Re: Stupidity Squared blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 2009-07-01T18:17:25-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Cracked versions adding LAN support???</p> <p>I highly doubt it.</p> <p>PC bangs offering Single player SC2 only, yeah, I'd like to see that.</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 anonymous 2009-07-01T20:37:57-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Comment by anonymous</p> <p> <p> My point isn't that cracked versions offering LAN play will come around; my point is that this measure won't prevent any piracy. The organized theft isn't impeded by this stuff at all, and if you think it is, you aren't thinking.</p> </p> </div> Re: Stupidity Squared blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 2009-07-02T12:02:20-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>And my point is, although it's just as easy to pirate, that pirated version will be *much* less attractive for consumers, as a major part of the game WILL be inaccessible.</p> <p>As a result, consumers who wants to enjoy SC2, is much more likely to either:</p> <p>-A) Not buy it, and be content with pirated singleplayer</p> <p>- B) Buy it</p> <p>Somehow, I doubt the set of consumers who'd pirate and play multiplayer through "LAN over internet"-services such as GameRanger, will now ALL choose A) over B).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.</p> </div> blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Stupidity_Squared&entry=3423836840 anonymous 2009-07-02T12:29:53-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Comment by anonymous</p> <p> <p>Blizzard to Customers: &quot;We've removed functionality for your enjoyment&quot;</p> </p> </div> Re: Re: Stupidity Squared http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423836840 And there was much rejoicing http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=And_there_was_much_rejoicing&entry=3423822282 gadgets Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:44:42 EDT

With an agreement in hand to standardize on mini-USB for phones, can we do the same for other gadgets? Cameras, video cameras, etc?

China previously announced plans (way back in 2007) to enforce an universal cell phone charger, which was (and still is) a great idea. Now the European Commission has struck a deal with Apple and other cell phone manufacturers to start selling phones with universal cell phone chargers starting next year. The EC has decided on the same adapter as China, a micro-USB connector.

I'm enough of a cynic about Apple to say that I'll believe it when I see it though.

Technorati Tags: ,

]]> 3423822282 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423822282 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423822282 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=And_there_was_much_rejoicing&entry=3423822282 blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=And_there_was_much_rejoicing&entry=3423822282 Sch 2009-07-01T03:33:49-04:00 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>They are allowed to provide an external adaptor. So, both proprietary and this USB connector can coexist.</p> </div> http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423822282 Web Velocity Video Updates http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Web_Velocity_Video_Updates&entry=3423812450 webVelocity Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:00:50 EDT

Web Velocity

With the eval of Web Velocity available, I thought I'd reorganize the video pages:

I'll be updating the videos to be more current over the next little while; enjoy!

Technorati Tags: , ,

]]> 3423812450 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423812450 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423812450 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423812450 Smalltalk Daily 6/30/09: Intro to Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Smalltalk_Daily_6/30/09:_Intro_to_Web_Velocity&entry=3423810772 smalltalkDaily Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:52 EDT

Today's Smalltalk Daily does a basic overview of Web Velocity. To watch, click on the viewer below:

If you have trouble viewing that directly, you can click here to download the video directly

You can also watch it on YouTube:

Technorati Tags: , ,

]]> 3423810772 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3423810772 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3423810772 no James Robertson Introduction to Web Velocity A basic overview of Web Velocity 3:52 smalltalk, dynamic, seaside, smalltalk daily, web velocity nonadult James Robertson Introduction to Web Velocity http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3423810772