<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<feed version="1.0" xmlns="uri/of/echo/namespace#" xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/">
	<title>Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants - Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView</link>
	<subtitle>Cincom Product Manager</subtitle>
	<modified>2003-08-7T16:30:35-0500</modified>
	<entry>
		<title>Ahh </title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237626512</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237626512</id>
		<created>2003-08-7T16:30:34-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-7T16:30:34-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-7T16:30:34-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>James Robertson</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[I'll read more carefully next time...

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Java &amp; inheritance</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237655868</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237655868</id>
		<created>2003-08-7T11:1:31-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-7T11:1:31-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-7T11:1:31-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dave</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Well said, both of you.  Inheritance is a tool... use it wisely.  It was way overused & overhyped in the early days of OO (or C++ at least).



That said.. the sonstant Java bashing is getting a bit tired... sure.. it ain't no Smalltalk.. but it ain't no C++ , either :)



The problem isn't Java designers per se.. but more so the great masses of commodity Java programmers that just don't know what the f2k they're doing.



Dave

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Powerpoint Remix</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237630296</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237630296</id>
		<created>2003-08-7T10:37:16-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-7T10:37:16-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-7T10:37:16-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Alan Wostenberg</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[The medium is the message. See Edward R. Tuftes original The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint Presented in the Form of a PowerPoint Presentation at <a href="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/000931">http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/000931</a> 

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>BitWorking</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237626512</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237626512</id>
		<created>2003-08-6T15:33:29-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-6T15:33:29-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-6T15:33:29-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Joe</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Actually, it's an example of how the API can be extended, so you would have to compare it to the metaWeblogAPI and not RSS.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Disk space</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237555236</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237555236</id>
		<created>2003-08-6T2:3:30-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-6T2:3:30-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-6T2:3:30-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[There's another factor to consider (beyond disk cost and memory cost): download time. even if you distribute on hard media, stepping over a gygabyte cause you use several CDs or go for DVD (cutting potentional customers). Internet bandwith seems to be more expensive then disks.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Maybe....</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237555236</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237555236</id>
		<created>2003-08-5T17:29:16-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-5T17:29:16-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-5T17:29:16-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>John Dougan</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Hmmmm..I think he's half right. DLL's/Shared Libraries/etc. are not really meant to limit disk usage but rather core usage. You can do the same calculation with current RAM costs, but it also has the limiting factor that (at least with a 32 bit processor) you only have 4 GB address space.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>I have to say I agree</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237275853</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237275853</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T22:20:49-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T22:20:49-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T22:20:49-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Ben Langhinrichs</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[I agree with your point that this is more about different language coding styles and such.  Frans is partly demonstrating a preconception about coding and debugging, when what is meant is coding and debugging in C# in the IDE used.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: And yet it works...</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237439318</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237439318</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T19:46:42-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T19:46:42-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T19:46:42-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Michael Lucas-Smith</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237439318">And yet it works...</a>  by Michael Lucas-Smith

<p></p>How uninformed can you be if you think namespaces break interoperability? fool.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: The sweet spot for RSS</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237439851</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237439851</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T19:44:32-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T19:44:32-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T19:44:32-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Michael Lucas-Smith</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237439851">The sweet spot for RSS</a>  by Michael Lucas-Smith

<p></p>The eventual death of email? - Use IM's to replace person to person communication (small instance and long deferred) - Jabber is ripe for that. Also, with an IM protocol, you choose who talks to you, so there's no such thing as the traditional email spam. There may be an authentication request spam attack - but I doubt such a user would be kept on the network for long.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>To sum up</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237188185</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237188185</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T14:38:18-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T14:38:18-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T14:38:18-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Andres Valloud</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[I came up with a single sentence that illustrates this kind of situations, and also serves as motivation for XP practices:



    Unnecessary complexity artificially raises the value of small accomplishments.



Also, compare this to the desire to avoid becoming a commodity worker.  If it's complex, the need for developers that charge astronomical figures to do basic CRUD increases.



This is just more greed and not wanting to face what the real issue is.



Andres.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Regarding .zip...</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237273455</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237273455</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T14:18:1-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T14:18:1-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T14:18:1-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Andres Valloud</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[It's time to move over and discard zip's poor compression and feature set.  Check out RAR at www.rarlabs.com.  And mind you, RAR works essentially everywhere...



I have used RAR for archiving purposes since the DOS age.  I've never had a single problem with the 50GB++ pile of stuff I have compressed with it.



Andres.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Daddy, where do pattern come from?</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237365058</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237365058</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T13:50:8-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T13:50:8-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T13:50:8-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dave</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[I looked at the original article... it looks there like the NewTech guy said the bit about them bleeding into .Net.. that the thing about them coming from the Java world was from the author of the piece.



That not withstanding, NewTech does look like a completely clueless company.



Dave

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>are we there yet</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237274301</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237274301</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T8:39:30-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T8:39:30-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T8:39:30-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dave</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[I have to agree with Alan Kay: We haven't really come anywhere in the last 20-30 years.  

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>deevolution of programmers</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237197716</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237197716</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T8:34:15-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T8:34:15-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T8:34:15-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dave</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Yes, quite funny.. very well done.



But in a way it isn't funny... this is too close to how alot of people view programmers.  And did you look at their course descriptions... they are training code monkeys.



Dave

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>deevolution of programmers</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237197716</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237197716</id>
		<created>2003-08-4T8:34:13-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-4T8:34:13-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-4T8:34:13-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dave</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Yes, quite funny.. very well done.



But in a way it isn't funny... this is too close to how alot of people view programmers.  And did you look at their course descriptions... they are training code monkeys.



Dave

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Wireless in Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237390482</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237390482</id>
		<created>2003-08-3T19:53:15-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-3T19:53:15-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-3T19:53:15-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>David Buck</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[There's at least one restaurant in Ottawa that's offering wireless service.  Ironically, it's the restaurant we went to while you were in Ottawa last - Lone Star.  I've been able to connect to the Internet when I was there recently.  Cool, but I wouldn't normally bring a laptop into a restaurant.  It sounds a bit dangerous to me.  Pass the beer - oops!

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Patterns came from where?</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237365058</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237365058</id>
		<created>2003-08-3T15:27:24-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-3T15:27:24-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-3T15:27:24-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>disgusting</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237365058">Patterns came from where?</a>  by disgusting

<p></p>What a disgusting quote.  Soon they'll say that object oriented programming started with Java.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Ignorance is bliss...</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237365058</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237365058</id>
		<created>2003-08-3T12:50:28-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-3T12:50:28-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-3T12:50:28-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[...why ruin it for him?



]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Compilation by translation is independent of dynamic update</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237350430</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237350430</id>
		<created>2003-08-3T12:49:24-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-3T12:49:24-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-3T12:49:24-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[James, to answer your question about run-time update... Kelsey's approach is independent of this capability. If the target format supports dynamic update then tranlating from source to intermediate form to target form is equivalent to translating from source directly to target.



The time required to translate could be a factor, but I wouldn't think so.



Hey this would be a great approach for getting multiple languages to run in the VW environment!



-Patrick



]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Heh - Charles Miller on Clothes</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237349896</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237349896</id>
		<created>2003-08-3T11:7:46-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-3T11:7:46-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-3T11:7:46-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>rademers@mn.rr.com</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237349896">Heh - Charles Miller on Clothes</a>  by rademers@mn.rr.com

<p></p>I've gotten so shop-a-phobic that I won't even go into a clothing store (hardware stores are OK) unless there is a visible husband's chair near the front door.  This does not include stores that specialize in men's clothing -- I won't go into those at all! If my wife doesn't buy me stuff, I'll happily do without.  My "wardrobe" is an attrocious mess, and even I know it.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Microsoft's version of usefulness</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237273797</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237273797</id>
		<created>2003-08-3T2:6:48-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-3T2:6:48-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-3T2:6:48-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Mark Derricutt</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237273797">Microsoft's version of usefulness</a>  by Mark Derricutt

<p></p>Sounds the announcement "beware - an explosion of new bugs and security patches will follow."

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Come a long way?</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237274301</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237274301</id>
		<created>2003-08-2T11:3:35-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-2T11:3:35-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-2T11:3:35-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Referer</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Trackback from Referer

<a href="http://www.sax.net/live/?date=8/2/2003">Re: Come a long way?</a>

Follow the link for the reference...

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Etags</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237052708</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237052708</id>
		<created>2003-08-1T15:18:48-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-1T15:18:48-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-1T15:18:48-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>James  Robertson</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237052708">Etags</a>  by James  Robertson

<p></p>No,  Etags don't help.  That tells the client whether or not the document (as a whole) is different.  So if an Atom feed has a large biniary object in it, every single time the feed gets updated (which may be frequently in the case of a blog), the client has to download the <b>whole thinig again</b>.  Only after you get the document do you learn that you've seen the large binary object before.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Untitled</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237140150</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237140150</id>
		<created>2003-08-1T13:17:2-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-1T13:17:2-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-1T13:17:2-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dilip</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[there seems to be too much of nomenclature around that is extremely confusing.  Consider:



* Strong typing

* Weak typing

* Dynamic typing

* Static typing

* Strong binding

* Loose binding

* Loose typing



Check this out to get super-confused...

<a href="http://www.neward.net/ted/weblog/index.jsp?date=20030522#1053617115876">http://www.neward.net/ted/weblog/index.jsp?date=20030522#1053617115876</a> 

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Parrot?</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237183221</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237183221</id>
		<created>2003-08-1T13:14:4-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-1T13:14:4-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-1T13:14:4-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Daniel Von Fange</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Heard of the coming Parrot VM? (<a href="http://www.parrotcode.org/)">http://www.parrotcode.org/)</a> 

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Untitled</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237140150</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237140150</id>
		<created>2003-08-1T9:11:21-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-1T9:11:21-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-1T9:11:21-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>James Robertson</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237140150">Untitled</a>  by James Robertson

<p></p>The point is, Python - like Smalltalk - is <b>not</b> weakly typed.  C and C   are weakly typed - it's possible (via casting) to get the system to invoke a message on an object that can't handle it, and then crash ugly.  In Smalltalk (and, IIRC, in Python as well, and I believe in Ruby) - that's not the case.  You will get a well understood exception that can be dealt with easily.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Untitled</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237140150</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237140150</id>
		<created>2003-08-1T8:16:31-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-08-1T8:16:31-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-08-1T8:16:31-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Dilip</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Where does he say dynamic typing = weak typing?  As far as I can understand he said there is nothing to stop objects in a strongly typed system like CLR to be accessed in a loosely-bound manner.  Moreover he seems to point out that languages running for the CLR are distinct from weakly typed ones like Python or Ruby.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Re: Retro discussion on XML suckage</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237096372</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237096372</id>
		<created>2003-07-31T19:14:23-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-07-31T19:14:23-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-07-31T19:14:23-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Michael Lucas-Smith</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Comment on <a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3237096372">Retro discussion on XML suckage</a>  by Michael Lucas-Smith

<p></p>He describes XML as 'Somebody elses problem'. Cute, but SEP is exactly what Loose Coupling is. If you tightly couple something, it's your problem. If you loosely couple something, it's somebody elses problem.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>to whom much is given much is expected</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237100509</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237100509</id>
		<created>2003-07-31T14:47:40-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-07-31T14:47:40-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-07-31T14:47:40-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Alan Wostenberg</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Decades ago a guy told me interactive symbolic debuggers were bad for the same reason -- they made one sloppy. He, like today's dot net guy, do have a point. In our Smalltalk shop we tend to slap in production fixes in with the debugger rather than going to the root problem. 



However abuse does not disprove the rule that interactive edit&continue debuggers are powerful tools.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Oh Edit &amp; Continue...</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237100509</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237100509</id>
		<created>2003-07-31T10:49:47-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-07-31T10:49:47-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-07-31T10:49:47-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Mel Riffe</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[I miss the debugging features of Smalltalk.  But I disagree with the person's observation that E&C is  'bad debugging style'.  I would agree to the statement that any tool/feature has the potential to be misused and abused.  But saying the absence of E&C as a good thing makes me believe this person has not learned the true value of having E&C available during a debugging session.



There were/are many times I wish I had E&C available to me; it is said the latest JDK allows dynamic class replacement - I've yet to test it, though - that will allow debuggers to support E&C.

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Etags</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237052708</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237052708</id>
		<created>2003-07-31T10:1:14-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-07-31T10:1:14-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-07-31T10:1:14-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name></name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Hi, 



Etags should make this better but not every system supports them by far and they are kinda flaky at times.



Scott

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Untitled</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237010599</link>
		<id>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;entry=3237010599</id>
		<created>2003-07-31T6:29:23-0500</created>
		<issued>2003-07-31T6:29:23-0500</issued>
		<modified>2003-07-31T6:29:23-0500</modified>
		<author>
			<name>Chris Double</name>
		</author>
		<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:lang="en-us"><![CDATA[Nope, not me commenting on it. I think you mean Clarence Westberg.



Chris.

]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>

