<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:icbm="http://postneo.com/icbm" xmlns:includedComments="http://www.laudably.com/rss2-comments" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Smalltalk Tidbits, Industry Rants</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView</link>
		<description>Cincom Product Manager</description>
		<webMaster>jrobertson@cincom.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:53:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="/CincomSmalltalkWiki/Silt"></admin:generatorAgent>
		<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:jrobertson@cincom.com"></admin:errorReportsTo>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>James A. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2007 Cincom Systems, Inc.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-04-21T08:53:55-04:00</dc:date>
		<icbm:latitude>39.214103</icbm:latitude>
		<icbm:longitude>-76.878807</icbm:longitude>
		<item>
			<title>The Problem with Hulu</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=The_Problem_with_Hulu&amp;entry=3386083246</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:40:46 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The problem with <a href="http://www.hulu.com/">Hulu</a> - which seems pretty cool, with the wide range of content available - is the complete lockdown. I can watch a huge range of stuff (even old stuff) - <em>but I can't take it anywhere.</em> I can sit in front of my Laptop and watch it (hello, HD tv in ther other room) - but I can't transfer it to my iPod, I can't save it to my laptop to watch later (like, say, on a plane). So sure, it looks cool. Bottom line though: <em>utterly, totally, and completely useless. </em></p>
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3386083246</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3386083246</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3386083246</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=The_Problem_with_Hulu&amp;entry=3386083246</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=The_Problem_with_Hulu&amp;entry=3386083246</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>anon</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-04-20T20:40:56-04:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;amp;printTitle=The_Problem_with_Hulu&amp;amp;entry=3386083246"&gt;http://gizmodo.com/341067/d+link-dpg+1200-pc+on+tv-player-brings-lousy-amateur-youtube-video-to-your-tv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;works great with hulu&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/html&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>pc on tv</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=The_Problem_with_Hulu&amp;entry=3386083246</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=The_Problem_with_Hulu&amp;entry=3386083246</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Arden</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-04-21T08:53:54-04:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of the modern LCD flat panel tvs have PC and HDMI inputs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Plug in your iMini or Media Center PC, and I think you have a lot of options, including this one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Arden&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>More options</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
			</includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3386083246</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Stupid Brigade Rules at NBC</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=The_Stupid_Brigade_Rules_at_NBC&amp;entry=3386004455</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:47:35 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Looks like <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080417-exec-apple-must-address-piracy-before-nbc-returns-to-itunes.html">NBC is still on the stupid train</a> - they say they want to be back on iTunes, but only if Apple lets them do stupid stuff - like jack up the prices and prevent shows from playing on iPods. Yeah, there's a plan: disable all of the useful functionality and charge more! If Zucker has learned anything, it's not obvious :)</p>
<!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/nbc" rel="tag">nbc</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/itunes" rel="tag">itunes</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/stupidity" rel="tag">stupidity</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3386004455</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3386004455</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3386004455</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3386004455</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jericho? Bah</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Jericho_Bah&amp;entry=3385459609</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:26:49 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>I finally sat down and watched the last episode of season 2 of Jericho; it had more holes in it than the first season, which was hard to do. On the other hand, if you're the kind of conspiracy nut who still thinks FDR planned Pearl Harbor (not to mention the more modern versions of the same thinking), then maybe you'll enjoy it - it definitely falls into the &quot;6 impossible things before breakfast&quot; theory of plot development.</p>
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3385459609</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3385459609</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3385459609</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3385459609</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fewer Repeats</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Fewer_Repeats&amp;entry=3384745778</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:09:38 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>SciFi Wire <a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=1&amp;id=51670">reports</a> an interesting trend at NBC - fewer repeats during the opening run of a season:</p>
<blockquote>NBC's returning genre shows--Heroes, Chuck and Medium--will each air a full complement of original episodes next season, in contrast to this year's strike-truncated season, with Heroes and Chuck set to air without repeats for 13 episodes. </blockquote><p>Part of this is the competition for attention: DVRs, on-demand video, the internet, gaming consoles. It's going to get tighter, too. I spotted this story about a big <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080402/ap_on_hi_te/comcast_faster_internet">upgrade</a> to Comcast service out in Minneapolis:</p><blockquote>Comcast Corp. will start offering faster Internet services in Minnesota's Twin Cities region on Thursday, with plans to extend that type of next-generation system to its entire service area by 2010.</blockquote><blockquote>...</blockquote><blockquote>With the faster service, a customer could download a 4 gigabyte high-definition movie in about 10 minutes, compared with about an hour at previous speeds.</blockquote><p>As that kind of service rolls out, online behavior is going to change a lot. Never mind BitTorrent; that's a bleeding edge use, and while it impacts things, the mainstream applications (iTunes, for instance) are going to start driving big changes. How will viewing behavior change when we can download an HD movie almost as fast as we can download a single song? It's going to cause a shift.</p><!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/downloads" rel="tag">downloads</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/torrents" rel="tag">torrents</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3384745778</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3384745778</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3384745778</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3384745778</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Replicators Explained</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Replicators_Explained&amp;entry=3383197006</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:56:46 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>If you watch Stargate SG-1, you know about the replicators. Well, in the movie that just came out (which wraps up the ORI thread), we learn <a href="http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Stargate-Code-of-the-Replicators.aspx">why the replicators are so devious</a> - the little buggers are Javascript powered. Clearly, to stop them the team should hav e deployed a SOA solution :)</p>
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3383197006</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3383197006</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3383197006</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3383197006</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Back to the Future for Video</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:29:04 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p><a href="http://www.beet.tv/2008/01/sponsorship-wil.html">Andy Plesser</a> thinks that sponsored shows are the wave of the future online - which is an interesting step back to the dawn of TV. Way back when, shows were often sponsored by one company in order to promote a brand (I recall a morning wildlife show sponsored by Mutual of Omaha - and the funny thing is, I remember the company better than I remember the show. Could we be heading back that way? I think it's a model that could work online, so long as the sponsor and the audience match up well.</p>

<!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iptv" rel="tag">iptv</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/video" rel="tag">video</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3378367744</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3378367744</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3378367744</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>chuck</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-21T12:00:05-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mutual of Omaha&amp;#39;s Wild Kingdom!&amp;nbsp; Oh man, suddenly memories of hundreds of lazy childhood Sunday afternoons.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>YES</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>
Dennis Smith</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-21T16:33:54-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comment by 
Dennis Smith&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Gillette Cavalcade of Sports!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And yes there were quite a few, names don't come to mind instantly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>
Re: Back to the Future for Video</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Patrick Logan</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-22T12:07:48-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.wildkingdom.com/nostalgia/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That was a great show as a kid, Marlin Perkins and Jim Fowler. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just last Sunday night I was watching Jim Kelly, ex-Buffalo Bills QB, being interviewed on &amp;quot;Chevrolet&amp;#39;s Tim McCarver Show&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Steven Fenger</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-22T17:28:25-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Show sponsorship is already coming back to regular TV.&amp;nbsp; There have been a number of shows with no commercials or so-called &amp;quot;limited interruptions&amp;quot; (just two or three commercial breaks with only ads from the sponsoring company.&amp;nbsp; Though at the moment it only seems to be for highly anticipated premiers, either for a season or a new show.&amp;nbsp; For example, Ford has sponsored the season premier of 24 with limited interruptions. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>Already happening on broadcast TV</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Back_to_the_Future_for_Video&amp;entry=3378367744</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Tom Sattler</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-23T12:04:08-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And no matter what the animals on the show did, Marlin Perkins could find a way to equate it to insurance.&amp;nbsp; Truly remarkable.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title></includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
			</includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3378367744</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Who did they talk to about DVRs?</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:52:59 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Hmm - via <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2008/01/links-for-2008.html">Steve Rubel,</a> I see that some people are trying to believe some <a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2008/01/03/dvr-use-not-having-huge-impact-on-ratings/?camp=rssfeed&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink">pretty strange things about DVR use:</a></p>
<blockquote>On average, half of all DVR primetime program playback occurs within the same day of recording. By the end of the following day, DVR owners complete approximately three-quarters of all program playback, Palisades said</blockquote><p>I'd love to see their sample space of DVR users - it neither matches our use, nor that of anyone else I know with a DVR. </p><!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/dvr" rel="tag">dvr</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/advertising" rel="tag">advertising</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3376882379</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3376882379</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3376882379</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Tom Sattler</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-04T08:17:23-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certainly doesn&amp;#39;t match the Tivo use in our house.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title></includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Patrick Mueller</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-04T08:33:24-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I assume this is what you are referring to:

"Equally significant, the top 10 most-DVR'd primetime shows among adults 18-49 are played back as much as 58 percent on the same day (CBS's Survivor: China) and as little as 27 percent (CW's Reaper)"

That actually DOES match our usage.  For our favorite shows, we typically will start them within a half hour of when they actually start, SPECIFICALLY to avoid the commercials.  It's not unusual for us to 'catch up' to the show, live, before it ends.  It's almost a game.  For other stuff we record, it might sit there for a week before we get to it, if at all.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>read it again</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Who_did_they_talk_to_about_DVRs&amp;entry=3376882379</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Justin Rudd</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-01-04T17:26:02-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it is a popular show (24, Lost, etc.), I will watch it the same night I record it just so it won&amp;#39;t be ruined for me with idle chit chat the following day.&amp;nbsp; Most reality shows that I watch, I record and watch in the same night.&amp;nbsp; But I tend to fast forward to the very end of the reality show, watch how they get kicked off, and then read the recap on the web :)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>I'm with Patrick</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
			</includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3376882379</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How Stupid is CBS?</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=How_Stupid_is_CBS&amp;entry=3376848998</link>
			<category>tv</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:36:38 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Apparently, pretty stupid. I'm watching CSI, and it happens to be the night of the Iowa Caucuses. Sure, those are newsworthy, and I expect updates trawling through the bottom area of the TV screen. What does CBS do, though? They push the show into a corner, run a text update - and silence the audio to play &quot;dramatic&quot; music. </p>
<p>WTF is up with that? Silence the audio for the show to play dramatic music? Are they taking &quot;how can I piss off my customers&quot; lessons from the RIAA?</p><!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/stupidity" rel="tag">stupidity</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3376848998</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3376848998</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3376848998</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3376848998</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
