<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:icbm="http://postneo.com/icbm" xmlns:includedComments="http://www.laudably.com/rss2-comments" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Smalltalk Tidbits, Industry Rants</title>
		<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView</link>
		<description>Cincom Product Manager</description>
		<webMaster>jrobertson@cincom.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:53:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="/CincomSmalltalkWiki/Silt"></admin:generatorAgent>
		<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:jrobertson@cincom.com"></admin:errorReportsTo>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>James A. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2007 Cincom Systems, Inc.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-05-01T12:53:10-04:00</dc:date>
		<icbm:latitude>39.214103</icbm:latitude>
		<icbm:longitude>-76.878807</icbm:longitude>
		<item>
			<title>Wave Goodbye to the DVD</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Wave_Goodbye_to_the_DVD&amp;entry=3387099190</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:53:10 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This news about iTunes - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/01/apple-itunes-to-compete-day-and-date-with-dvd-releases-wal/">movies being available there on the same day as DVD release</a> - is huge. Combine that with &quot;On Demand&quot;, and you can see that DVD sales are headed to the same place that CD sales went:</p>
<blockquote>Hollywood Reporter says that Apple is expected to announce today an across-the-board deal to sell new release films at its iTunes Store. The deal is said to allow Apple to offer a &quot;broad slate of top-shelf films&quot; day-and-date with home video releases -- a long time sticking point with brick-and-mortar interests who want to keep their early-release edge on digital downloads. The deal includes Fox, Walt Disney Studios, Warner Bros., Paramount, Universal, Sony Pictures, Lionsgate, New Line and more -- all of which are currently inked to deliver rentals through iTunes.</blockquote><p>IMHO, Sony isn't going to enjoy the Bu-Ray win for long.</p><!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/dvd" rel="tag">dvd</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iTunes" rel="tag">iTunes</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3387099190</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3387099190</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3387099190</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3387099190</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cloverfield</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Cloverfield&amp;entry=3380828631</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:03:51 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>We went to see <a href="http://www.cloverfieldmovie.com/">Cloverfield</a> this evening - it's a pretty good monster/horror flick, with the twist being the first person POV used to tell the story. My only critique? The first 20 minutes could have been done in ten minutes instead. Otherwise - relentless. It came at me the way I remember the first Terminator movie coming at me.</p>
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3380828631</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3380828631</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3380828631</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Cloverfield&amp;entry=3380828631</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Cloverfield&amp;entry=3380828631</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Boris</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-02-19T01:20:21-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;+1! I gotta have me HD-DVD copy when it comes out... Err... Make that Blue-Ray :) 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title></includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Cloverfield&amp;entry=3380828631</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Cloverfield&amp;entry=3380828631</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Ramon Leon</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2008-02-19T10:38:57-05:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eh, it was a Blair Witch rip off, and while the action was non stop, they left too many things hanging open or unexplained.&amp;nbsp; It was OK, but I wouldn&amp;#39;t pay to see it again.&amp;nbsp; Not in the same league as the Terminator. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>Bah!</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
			</includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3380828631</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>And there was much Rejoicing</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=And_there_was_much_Rejoicing&amp;entry=3375456145</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:42:25 EST</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p><a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=3&amp;id=46530">Definitely cheer-worthy:</a></p>

<blockquote>
The Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson has settled his differences with New Line Cinema and will executive-produce a two-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit, the studio announced. 
</blockquote>

<!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/lotr" rel="tag">lotr</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/hobbits" rel="tag">hobbits</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3375456145</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3375456145</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3375456145</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3375456145</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is High School Musical Really this Big?</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Is_High_School_Musical_Really_this_Big&amp;entry=3365024211</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:56:51 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Well, there was a daily &quot;Pep Rally&quot; at Disney Hollywood Studios, and my daughter and her friends are positively <em>obsessed.</em> Here's a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/business/media/20disney.html?hp">NY Times story</a> that shows that it could be the biggest basic cable event ever.</p>
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3365024211</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3365024211</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3365024211</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3365024211</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Order of the Phoenix</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Order_of_the_Phoenix&amp;entry=3361645447</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:24:07 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>I just got back from the latest Potter flick - &quot;Harry Potter and the Order of the Phenix&quot;. I loved it - good pacing, and the story line with the Ministry of Magic's &quot;head in the sand&quot; reaction was perfect. My wife and daughter both that the woman who played &quot;The Trunchbull&quot; in &quot;Mathilda&quot; would have made a better weasel than the actress who played that role, but I thought she was quite good.</p>
<p>Anyway - well worth seeing.</p></div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3361645447</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3361645447</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3361645447</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3361645447</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Off to See Harry Potter</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Off_to_See_Harry_Potter&amp;entry=3361619272</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:07:52 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>I'll be offline for a bit, as I'm headed out to see the new Potter flick with the family. I'll have more to say after I see it :)</p>
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3361619272</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3361619272</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3361619272</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection></includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3361619272</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Terminator 4 New Trilogy?</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:25:51 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p><a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=3&amp;id=41436">SciFi Wire</a> reports that a new Terminator flick - possibly the start of a new trilogy - is on the boards. If they stay with the idea of showing us the post-SkyNet future, that could work. I just hope they don't get all Lucas-esque on us, and get high on their own fame and deliver the equivalent of the last three Star Wars flicks (utter dreck), or - gosh forbid - the hash that was the last Matrix movie.</p>
<!-- technorati tags start --><p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: 
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/scifi" rel="tag">scifi</a></p><!-- technorati tags end -->
</div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3356249151</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3356249151</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3356249151</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Tim Wang</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2007-05-10T15:18:04-04:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do I sense you liked the Terminator 3? 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title></includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Rick</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2007-05-11T07:43:11-04:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m assuming that Lucas had too many yes men around him, and nobody had the balls to tell him that the scripts were tailored to five year olds.  Maybe we need an online petition to see if Ridley Scott can do T4.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>No Lucas-esque please</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Terminator_4_New_Trilogy&amp;entry=3356249151</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>Rick</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2007-05-11T07:44:19-04:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;T3 sucked...there&amp;#39;s no getting around that.  T2 actually wasn&amp;#39;t too bad for a sequel.  Why do I have bad vibes about T4?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>About T3</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
			</includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3356249151</wfw:comment>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Grindhouse: Slow pickup</title>
			<link>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Grindhouse:_Slow_pickup&amp;entry=3353558285</link>
			<category>movies</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:58:05 EDT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p><a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=3&amp;id=40990">SCI FI Wire</a> reports that Grindhouse is getting a slow pickup:</p>

<blockquote>
Grindhouse was a box-office horror over the Easter weekend, opening in a disappointing fourth place with only $11.6 million, despite positive buzz for the faux double feature from directors Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino, the Hollywood trade papers and wire services reported.
</blockquote>

<p>When you bring a movie to market that runs over 3 hours, it has to be really, really god to make big money. The production costs for this flick were reportedly low, so it might still end up on the positive side of the ledger - but how well would it have done had they dropped it down to 2 hours, or - even crazier - syndicated it out to cable TV as a 2 or three part serial?</p></div>]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3353558285</guid>
			<pingback:server>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIPBServlet?guid=3353558285</pingback:server>
			<pingback:target>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?guid=3353558285</pingback:target>
			<includedComments:comment-collection>
				<includedComments:comment>
					<includedComments:guid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Grindhouse:_Slow_pickup&amp;entry=3353558285</includedComments:guid>
					<includedComments:puid>blogView?showComments=true&amp;printTitle=Grindhouse:_Slow_pickup&amp;entry=3353558285</includedComments:puid>
					<includedComments:author>eric</includedComments:author>
					<includedComments:pubDate>2007-04-09T12:44:52-04:00</includedComments:pubDate>
					<includedComments:content>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or syndicated to iTunes for iPod/AppleTV or to MSN Live for Xbox360.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</includedComments:content>
					<includedComments:title>Or syndicated to ...</includedComments:title>
				</includedComments:comment>
			</includedComments:comment-collection>
			<wfw:comment>http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/servlet/CommentAPIServlet?guid=3353558285</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
