podcast

Industry Misinterpretations 133: Smalltalk and FPGAs

April 25, 2009 22:57:07.689

This week Michael and I spoke to Jecel Mattos de Assumpcao. We spoke to him as part of the Squeak boarda few weeks ago, but this week we talked to him about his background in Smalltalk, and some of the interesting work he's done with custom hardware and Smalltalk implementations. It was a wide ranging talk, and a lot of fun. To listen now, click here.

If you have feedback, send it to smalltalkpodcasts@cincom.com - or visit us on Facebook or Ning - you can vote for the Podcast Alley, and subscribe on iTunes. If you enjoy the podcast, pass the word - we would love to have more people hear about Smalltalk!

Technorati Tags: ,

Enclosures:
[http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/audio/2009/industry_misinterpretations133.mp3 ( Size: 16381560 )]

Comments

Smalltalk and clones

[Jecel Assumpção Jr] April 26, 2009 14:11:14.632

I failed to make the connection between the context (the brazillian market full of clones running pirated software) and the advantages of a Smalltalk computer:

  1. Since software development is so much faster in Smalltalk, it would be possible for an original design to quickly get a reasonable software library.
  2. You don't have to be a clone to share software with other Smalltalk computers, just like Unix machines weren't clones.
  3. Apple was successful in killing the local Macintosh clone, which left Brazil without GUI based computers until Windows 3.1 in 1992 or so. Had we launched a Smalltalk computer as originally planned in December of 1987, there wouldn't be competition in that regard for a few years.

More information about the current project will soon be available at http://siliconqueak.org/

[] April 27, 2009 13:50:13.267

I see that I did not answer Michael's question about current copyright (if it is good for software development). I have always been a huge fan of Free Software and don't like the current trends in copyright laws, though software patents are a far larger threat to progress. What I did say was that different rules inside and outside the country caused problems. Either a stronger copyright protection inside the country (so that local programmers could have made money) or weaker protection outside (so foreign companies couldn't become so rich) would have made cloning less compelling.

 Share Tweet This
-->